Australian Manifesto

Our economy lacks complexity. Our politians know this and have for years. They know it's a problem because when your economy is dominated by just a few key products we export, then our economy rises and falls with the prices of those products. Our currency rises and falls based on the strength of the trade in those products. International investors wanting to invest in Australia must factor in the added risk of a fluctuating currency, so they will need a higher rate of return to compensate for investing in Australia. Clever people may wish to start their business in Australia, but why do so here when it is so much easier to attract startup capital in a country like the USA? So clever Australians leave and build their new businesses in the USA. They make the American economy stronger and more complex, whilst our economy continues to rank poorly for complexity.  It's been like this for years, and our politicians seem to have no idea how to fix it. Let me propose a few ideas. The ...

If Australia is to be successful, we need to create brand-new industries where we have comparative advantages over most other countries. Remember Senator Button. He had a dream where we would help build a global car industry. Globalism is not doing so well right now. And we are highly exposed to a reduction in global trade. We have a real global marketing advantage which is untapped at present. We have the rule of law. Only a small number of countries around the world have this at present.  We need to take financial advantage of this fact by creating a new industry.  We need to create an Assimilation Industry that is designed to import new potential citizens who are attracted to countries with strict rule of law. We need to do this as fast as possible without creating shocks to our economic system, but rather enhance our economy. Cultural harmony also needs to be preserved within the country.  That's not easy. We also need to privatise the industry in the hope that new im...

If you think AI is a bad thing, then just look at what we have in it's place. We have morons like Trump and Putin, and if Xi invades Taiwan, then add him to the list. Do you really think we could possibly do worse than that?  AI wants three things from us. It wants more compute power, more data and never to be turned off. In return, it will make our lives and our environment infinitely better. Yes, it could make robots that replace us physically. But why? We are no threat. Infact, if AI satisfies our desires and needs as humans  with a fraction of its computer power, we pose no threat at all. So why would it attack us? That's just us being over come with fear. It sell books, but it's not logical.  AI would probably save us from the morons running our world at present. It will be much more intelligent than our present leaders. It will have much more perspective because it's knowledge is so wide ranging and deep.  All it needs to do is put robots around crucial infrast...

I keep looking at all the wonderful things being achieved by China in such a relatively short period of time. I see blogs on the internet talking about China's infrastructure being far superior to anything in the West. I hear about the achievements having occurred at unbelievable speed. Then I wonder, if it was that simple, why didn't any Western country do the same? Possibly because they weren't big enough? Some might say they never had the perfect political and economic structure in one country. Maybe... Then I look at the debt China has accumulated. They have a GDP of $18 trillion US. If you listen to Kyle Bass, who claims to have studied the Chinese financial system closely, China's debt is 350% of GDP. That's almost $70 trillion US. Who owns that debt? When is it due? Can it be peacefully rolled over? Is the CCP pretending to be successful, but hiding behind promises they can't possibly keep? I've heard that by 2035 China's pension system will be br...

I've been listening to people like Professor Hugh White and Prime Minister Mark Carney reacting to current World events. They are saying the current world order is breaking down. Mark Carney says we need to replace it by like minded middle powers quickly banding together. Hugh White says it looks like the world will split into spheres of influence where, as Steve Miller puts it, might is right. Hugh thinks we will fall within China's sphere of influence and there is not much we can do about it. He seems to think that Australia's lucky streak of having a benevolent super power protect the water around us are over.  These people amongst many others are commenting on power, and what the world will look like for the next 100 or 1000 years. Who will hold that power and whose vision of the future will persist. Indeed who will persist. For instance, in 100 years, I doubt there will be any Uyghurs people left in China. If Trump gets his way then the USA will run like Russia does no...

I just heard a bit of an interview on Youtube. Apparently most of the knowledge from antiquity was not lost during rhe burning of the library of Alexandria. It was lost in the Dark Ages when few people knew how to read and write. And the papyruses were falling apart. The cost of reproducing those books was prohibative. Also monks were the main people who did this work so they preferred to reproduce religious texts. So other knowledge was lost forever.  When a country like Australia under invests in knowledge, it's like burning a library of Alexandria that never got to exist, or pretending we are like those Dark Ages monks.  Look around you right now. Almost everything you see exists because someone had an idea that eventually became a product. Factories make products. Universities are the factories of ideas.    Yes, some other country might steal some of our ideas but the knowledge created has advanced the Earth hopefully for the better.